Containment is not just "locking things up." If D3 fails, it doesn't matter how good your D4 is. Save this cautionary tale.
A factory did textbook D3 on paper tracing every pallet in their warehouse. The customer still found defective parts because the factory missed a third-party logistics warehouse. That cost them the account. A decade of business destroyed by a boundary error. D3 is about the physical boundary. Map every location in three tiers: raw materials and WIP, finished goods and in-transit, field and third-party. For each location you need count, quarantine, and a designated person. The clean point is the first serial number guaranteed defect-free. Without it you cannot resume production. The third element is verification using an independent inspection method. If visual found it use mechanical testing for the sort. D3 is not a spreadsheet someone must physically walk into every location touch the parts lock the cages and verify the clean point. The financial impact of a D3 failure extends far beyond immediate sorting costs. When a customer removes a supplier the replacement cost includes qualification PPAP trials and learning curve inefficiencies. The cost of sending one person to physically verify a third-party warehouse is negligible compared to losing a customer account. This is the economic case for investing in D3 rigor that every quality engineer should present...
8D.wiki — Quality Engineering Knowledge Base